Post by account_disabled on Dec 31, 2023 4:27:23 GMT -5
A Tudorel Toader judge Augustin Zegrean judge Fabian Niculae assistant magistrate On the agenda is the resolution of the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. of the Code of Civil Procedure exception raised by Nicolae Gabriel Zanfir in File no. . of the th District Court of Bucharest Civil Section II and which forms the subject of the Constitutional Court File no. .D. The debates took place on July with the participation of the representative of the Public Ministry prosecutor Liviu Drgnescu being recorded in the conclusion of the meeting from that date when the.
Court based on the provisions of art. of Law no. and of art. para. of Country Email List the Code of Civil Procedure in conjunction with those of art. of Law no. postponed the pronouncement for July the date on which he pronounced this decision. COURT considering the documents and works of the file states the following By the Conclusion of October issued in File no. . Bucharest District Court Civil Section II referred to the Constitutional Court with the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. of the Code of.
Civil Procedure exception raised by as its object the resolution of an enforcement appeal. In justifying the exception of unconstitutionality its author shows in essence that the criticized legal provisions violate the constitutional provisions as they create an unfavorable situation for the defendant by referring to that of the plaintiff considering that the former cannot completemodify hisher he completes his defenses in response until the same procedural moment respectively until the first term to which he is legally cited. The defendant can make his defenses in fact and in law only within the term of days from the date of receipt of the summons. The th District.
Court based on the provisions of art. of Law no. and of art. para. of Country Email List the Code of Civil Procedure in conjunction with those of art. of Law no. postponed the pronouncement for July the date on which he pronounced this decision. COURT considering the documents and works of the file states the following By the Conclusion of October issued in File no. . Bucharest District Court Civil Section II referred to the Constitutional Court with the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. of the Code of.
Civil Procedure exception raised by as its object the resolution of an enforcement appeal. In justifying the exception of unconstitutionality its author shows in essence that the criticized legal provisions violate the constitutional provisions as they create an unfavorable situation for the defendant by referring to that of the plaintiff considering that the former cannot completemodify hisher he completes his defenses in response until the same procedural moment respectively until the first term to which he is legally cited. The defendant can make his defenses in fact and in law only within the term of days from the date of receipt of the summons. The th District.